SMH vs. NFLX
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 36.92%/yr vs 24.31%/yr for NFLX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMH vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -11.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 36.92%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively lower 24.31% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 66.10%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 137.42%
- 3Y*
- 60.43%
- 5Y*
- 37.89%
- 10Y*
- 36.92%
NFLX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -11.86%
- 6M
- -14.62%
- 1Y
- -33.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 24.31%
SMH vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 66.10% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -11.86% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 67.11% | 20.89% | 39.44% | 55.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and NFLX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2002 | 0.38 |
The correlation between SMH and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
NFLX
SMH vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMH | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 0.82 | +0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.26 | -0.77 | +10.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.80 | -1.36 | +36.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMH | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27 | -1.01 | +5.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 0.26 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | 0.59 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SMH vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, roughly equal to the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and NFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -81.99% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -43.35% | +28.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -43.35% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -75.95% | +30.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -75.95% | +30.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -38.29% | +32.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.07% | -24.90% | -16.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 24.70% | -20.74% |
Volatility
SMH vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 6.64%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.45% | 6.64% | +8.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.71% | 25.22% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 33.15% | -0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.32% | 43.10% | -7.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.75% | 41.52% | -8.77% |
Dividends
SMH vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and NFLX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to NFLX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs NFLX's -81.99%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and NFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer