SMH vs. MUYY
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and MUYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while MUYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. SMH is passively managed, while MUYY is actively managed. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for MUYY.
Performance
SMH vs. MUYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMH
- 1D
- 5.55%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- 6M
- 44.77%
- YTD
- 59.86%
- 1Y
- 99.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.82%
- 5Y*
- 34.46%
- 10Y*
- 34.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.32%
MUYY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $998.56K | $1.34M | $1.54M | |
| $8.39B | $7.14B | $7.06B |
SMH vs. MUYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 29.86% |
MUYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF | 5.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and MUYY is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. MUYY — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
MUYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMH vs. MUYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF (MUYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | MUYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. MUYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than MUYY's maximum drawdown of -10.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and MUYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | MUYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -10.76% | -74.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.93% | -9.81% | -4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.88% | -2.97% | -37.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.19% | — | — |
Volatility
SMH vs. MUYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | MUYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.78% | 18.80% | +19.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.59% | 18.80% | +17.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 18.80% | +14.57% |
SMH vs. MUYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MUYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. MUYY - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than MUYY's 35.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF | 35.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and MUYY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MUYY.
MUYY has the higher dividend yield at 35.62%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while MUYY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 1.07% for MUYY.
Find the right allocation for SMH and MUYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer