PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. MDFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH vs. MDFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund (MDFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than MDFGX's 8.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed MDFGX with an annualized return of 37.49%, while MDFGX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.67% annualized return.


SMH

1D
1.72%
1M
7.20%
YTD
72.15%
6M
75.62%
1Y
141.99%
3Y*
60.05%
5Y*
38.42%
10Y*
37.49%

MDFGX

1D
2.30%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
8.54%
6M
10.22%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
22.77%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
16.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. MDFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
72.15%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
MDFGX
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund
8.54%12.63%31.58%48.77%-37.83%20.78%40.16%31.89%1.81%32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and MDFGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000

0.76

The correlation between SMH and MDFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. MDFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MDFGX
MDFGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MDFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MDFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. MDFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund (MDFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMHMDFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.19

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.18

1.14

+8.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.74

3.80

+29.93

SMH vs. MDFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.13, which is higher than the MDFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and MDFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH vs. MDFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than MDFGX's maximum drawdown of -47.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and MDFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHMDFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-47.99%

-36.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-16.74%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-24.43%

-11.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-42.49%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-42.49%

-2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-6.14%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.04%

-11.22%

-29.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

4.99%

-0.93%

Volatility

SMH vs. MDFGX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund (MDFGX) at 6.95%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHMDFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.25%

6.95%

+9.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.73%

14.60%

+13.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.20%

18.18%

+15.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.47%

23.57%

+11.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.82%

22.58%

+10.24%

SMH vs. MDFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MDFGX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMH vs. MDFGX - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than MDFGX's 17.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDFGX
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund
17.98%19.51%12.73%3.59%9.46%12.95%5.46%10.67%14.31%12.51%4.01%11.22%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH and MDFGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to MDFGX (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs MDFGX's -47.99%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and MDFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer