SMH vs. IBTS.L
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and IBTS.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while IBTS.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for IBTS.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTS.L.
Performance
SMH vs. IBTS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMH is traded in USD, while IBTS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than IBTS.L's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed IBTS.L with an annualized return of 37.49%, while IBTS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
IBTS.L
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
SMH vs. IBTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
IBTS.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF | 0.32% | 5.49% | 4.02% | 3.79% | -3.89% | -0.28% | 2.72% | 4.39% | 1.15% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and IBTS.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2007 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. IBTS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
IBTS.L
SMH vs. IBTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | IBTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.12 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | 2.80 | +6.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | 8.03 | +25.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. IBTS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than IBTS.L's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and IBTS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | IBTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -16.87% | -68.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -1.07% | -13.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -1.45% | -34.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -6.87% | -38.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -7.24% | -38.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -0.65% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -10.07% | -30.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 0.37% | +3.69% |
Volatility
SMH vs. IBTS.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) at 1.60%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | IBTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 1.60% | +14.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 3.46% | +24.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 4.24% | +28.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 5.06% | +30.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 5.08% | +27.74% |
SMH vs. IBTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTS.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. IBTS.L - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than IBTS.L's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTS.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF | 3.99% | 4.22% | 4.12% | 3.08% | 0.75% | 0.61% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 1.49% | 1.01% | 0.67% | 0.49% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and IBTS.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while IBTS.L is Government Bonds. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.07% for IBTS.L.
Find the right allocation for SMH and IBTS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer