PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. IAUP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH vs. IAUP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 66.10% return, which is significantly higher than IAUP.L's -5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed IAUP.L with an annualized return of 36.92%, while IAUP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.00% annualized return.


SMH

1D
5.00%
1M
5.58%
YTD
66.10%
6M
62.81%
1Y
137.42%
3Y*
60.43%
5Y*
37.89%
10Y*
36.92%

IAUP.L

1D
-0.83%
1M
-14.34%
YTD
-5.97%
6M
0.57%
1Y
53.86%
3Y*
39.07%
5Y*
17.21%
10Y*
13.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. IAUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
66.10%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
IAUP.L
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc
-5.97%153.99%11.49%9.43%-11.06%-10.31%23.60%45.60%-9.55%6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and IAUP.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.10

The correlation between SMH and IAUP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (10 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMH vs. IAUP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMH
IAUP.L

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

99.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

SMH
100.0%
IAUP.L

-

Basic Materials

SMH

-

IAUP.L
99.8%

Communication Services

SMH

-

IAUP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SMH

-

IAUP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SMH

-

IAUP.L

-

Energy

SMH

-

IAUP.L

-

Financial Services

SMH

-

IAUP.L

-

Healthcare

SMH

-

IAUP.L

-

Industrials

SMH

-

IAUP.L
0.2%

Real Estate

SMH

-

IAUP.L

-

Utilities

SMH

-

IAUP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH vs. IAUP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUP.L
IAUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IAUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. IAUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMHIAUP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.22

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.26

1.80

+7.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.80

4.67

+30.13

SMH vs. IAUP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the IAUP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and IAUP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMHIAUP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27

1.22

+3.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

0.49

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

0.38

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.07

+0.26

Drawdowns

SMH vs. IAUP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than IAUP.L's maximum drawdown of -79.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and IAUP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMHIAUP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-79.88%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-29.72%

+14.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-29.72%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-44.90%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-51.26%

+5.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-29.72%

+23.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.07%

-48.71%

+7.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

11.50%

-7.54%

Volatility

SMH vs. IAUP.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) at 14.40%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMHIAUP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.45%

14.40%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.71%

35.45%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.42%

43.96%

-11.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.32%

35.45%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.75%

34.61%

-1.86%

SMH vs. IAUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUP.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMH vs. IAUP.L - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while IAUP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAUP.L
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH and IAUP.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IAUP.L.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while IAUP.L is Gold. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while IAUP.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.55% for IAUP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and IAUP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer