SMH vs. ENCC.TO
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and ENCC.TO (Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while ENCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. SMH is passively managed, while ENCC.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for ENCC.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ENCC.TO.
Performance
SMH vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMH is traded in USD, while ENCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ENCC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than ENCC.TO's 25.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed ENCC.TO with an annualized return of 37.49%, while ENCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.64% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
ENCC.TO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 25.34%
- 6M
- 24.91%
- 1Y
- 35.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.53%
- 5Y*
- 20.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
SMH vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 25.34% | 18.54% | 8.23% | 8.29% | 32.90% | 80.63% | -26.23% | 11.14% | -36.34% | -12.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and ENCC.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.27 |
The correlation between SMH and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMH vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
ENCC.TO
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SMH
ENCC.TO
-
Basic Materials
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
-
Communication Services
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
-
Energy
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
Financial Services
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
-
Healthcare
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
-
Industrials
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
-
Real Estate
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
-
Utilities
SMH
-
ENCC.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
ENCC.TO
SMH vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.39 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | 4.72 | +4.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | 13.64 | +20.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and ENCC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -95.55% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -7.46% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -18.42% | -17.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -31.30% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -83.55% | +38.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -50.19% | +47.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -65.13% | +24.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 2.58% | +1.48% |
Volatility
SMH vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) at 5.51%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 5.51% | +10.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 12.88% | +14.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 15.09% | +18.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 24.11% | +11.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 30.15% | +2.67% |
SMH vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 11.18% | 13.62% | 14.58% | 14.87% | 12.55% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 6.11% | 8.37% | 6.93% | 4.34% | 3.03% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ENCC.TO.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.
Find the right allocation for SMH and ENCC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer