SMH vs. DAPP
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and DAPP (VanEck Digital Transformation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while DAPP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMH returned 39.21%/yr vs -0.16%/yr for DAPP. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DAPP.
Performance
SMH vs. DAPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 77.13% return, which is significantly higher than DAPP's 33.03% return.
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
DAPP
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 33.03%
- 6M
- 15.86%
- 1Y
- 55.85%
- 3Y*
- 57.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH vs. DAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 24.08% |
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | 33.03% | 15.03% | 44.87% | 285.02% | -85.60% | -38.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and DAPP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SMH and DAPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMH vs. DAPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
DAPP
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SMH
DAPP
Basic Materials
SMH
-
DAPP
-
Communication Services
SMH
-
DAPP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
DAPP
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
DAPP
-
Energy
SMH
-
DAPP
-
Financial Services
SMH
-
DAPP
Healthcare
SMH
-
DAPP
-
Industrials
SMH
-
DAPP
-
Real Estate
SMH
-
DAPP
-
Utilities
SMH
-
DAPP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. DAPP — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
DAPP
SMH vs. DAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMH | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.18 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.59 | 1.16 | +9.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.63 | 2.28 | +38.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMH | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.19 | 0.91 | +4.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | -0.00 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | -0.07 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
SMH vs. DAPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, smaller than the maximum DAPP drawdown of -91.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and DAPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -91.90% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -48.21% | +33.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -58.88% | +23.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -91.90% | +46.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -27.06% | +27.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -57.42% | +16.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 24.56% | -20.67% |
Volatility
SMH vs. DAPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is 11.47%, while VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a volatility of 15.49%. This indicates that SMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.47% | 15.49% | -4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.29% | 46.31% | -22.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.56% | 61.71% | -31.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 72.90% | -37.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 72.64% | -40.07% |
SMH vs. DAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DAPP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. DAPP - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and DAPP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAPP has higher volatility (15.49%) compared to SMH (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs DAPP's -91.90%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 39.21% vs -0.16% for DAPP. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 11.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 39.21% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DAPP.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for DAPP.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while DAPP is Technology Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while DAPP tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.50% for DAPP.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and DAPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer