SMH vs. BRK-B
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMH vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 37.49%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 13.22% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- 1Y
- -0.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
SMH vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -2.67% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.95% | 2.37% | 10.93% | 3.01% | 21.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and BRK-B is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.34 |
The correlation between SMH and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
BRK-B
SMH vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.01 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | -0.02 | +9.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | -0.05 | +33.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -53.86% | -31.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -9.42% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -14.95% | -20.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -26.58% | -18.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -29.57% | -15.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -9.36% | +6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -11.07% | -29.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 4.53% | -0.47% |
Volatility
SMH vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.95%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 3.95% | +12.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 10.78% | +16.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 14.38% | +18.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 17.12% | +18.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 19.44% | +13.38% |
Dividends
SMH vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to BRK-B (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer