SMGB.L vs. IB01.L
SMGB.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) and IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SMGB.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index, while IB01.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMGB.L returned 36.22%/yr vs 3.84%/yr for IB01.L. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. SMGB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IB01.L.
Performance
SMGB.L vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMGB.L is traded in GBP, while IB01.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IB01.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMGB.L achieves a 76.18% return, which is significantly higher than IB01.L's 2.36% return.
SMGB.L
- 1D
- -4.19%
- 1M
- -9.43%
- 6M
- 62.45%
- YTD
- 76.18%
- 1Y
- 122.30%
- 3Y*
- 52.80%
- 5Y*
- 36.22%
- 10Y*
- —
IB01.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- —
SMGB.L vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 76.18% | 38.79% | 26.32% | 66.15% | -27.78% | 44.41% | -0.72% |
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.42% | -3.10% | 7.09% | -0.32% | 13.10% | 0.08% | -1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMGB.L and IB01.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMGB.L vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMGB.L
IB01.L
SMGB.L vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMGB.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.10 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.37 | 0.72 | +7.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.90 | 1.98 | +26.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMGB.L vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGB.L and IB01.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMGB.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.23% | -19.26% | -16.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.52% | -5.16% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.23% | -9.81% | -26.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.23% | -15.94% | -20.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.53% | -5.58% | -7.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.77% | -9.40% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 1.89% | +2.33% |
Volatility
SMGB.L vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a higher volatility of 16.71% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 1.74%. This indicates that SMGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMGB.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.71% | 1.74% | +14.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.79% | 4.96% | +24.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.04% | 6.50% | +29.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.55% | 8.45% | +23.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 8.76% | +22.23% |
SMGB.L vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMGB.L vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMGB.L nor IB01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMGB.L and IB01.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMGB.L.
SMGB.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. SMGB.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMGB.L and 0.07% for IB01.L.
Find the right allocation for SMGB.L and IB01.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer