PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMFG vs. AOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SMFG vs. AOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMFG achieves a 22.66% return, which is significantly higher than AOD's 12.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SMFG has outperformed AOD with an annualized return of 19.40%, while AOD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.38% annualized return.


SMFG

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.92%
YTD
22.66%
6M
21.15%
1Y
58.82%
3Y*
44.31%
5Y*
31.63%
10Y*
19.40%

AOD

1D
1.27%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
12.61%
6M
11.13%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMFG vs. AOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMFG
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
22.66%38.01%54.90%25.63%21.70%10.05%-11.00%19.47%-22.21%17.95%
AOD
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
12.61%32.14%16.03%12.65%-17.15%23.80%8.12%34.83%-17.63%35.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SMFG and AOD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2007

0.43

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

SMFG:

¥15.42T

AOD:

$93.67M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SMFG:

¥8.35T

AOD:

$252.71M

EBITDA (TTM)

SMFG:

¥3.54T

AOD:

$55.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMFG vs. AOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMFG
SMFG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AOD
AOD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMFG vs. AOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMFGAODDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.00

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

8.59

-0.29

SMFG vs. AOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the AOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMFG and AOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMFG vs. AOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMFG drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, which is greater than AOD's maximum drawdown of -72.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMFG and AOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMFGAODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.26%

-72.26%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.12%

-16.71%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.67%

-16.71%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.88%

-28.92%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.66%

-43.68%

-3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

-1.78%

-4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.94%

-27.20%

-20.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

3.89%

+3.21%

Volatility

SMFG vs. AOD - Volatility Comparison

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) at 5.22%. This indicates that SMFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMFGAODDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.67%

5.22%

+3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.83%

13.70%

+8.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.63%

15.99%

+12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.86%

16.77%

+12.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.81%

18.52%

+8.29%

Dividends

SMFG vs. AOD - Dividend Comparison

SMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than AOD's 11.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOD
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
11.81%12.00%10.73%8.56%8.85%6.75%7.80%7.71%9.57%7.29%9.10%8.93%
SMFG
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.26%2.84%2.82%3.67%2.12%0.00%5.97%4.61%4.80%3.17%3.63%3.32%

Financials

SMFG vs. AOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.51T
26.44M
(SMFG) Total Revenue
(AOD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SMFG values in JPY, AOD values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


SMFG and AOD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMFG has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to AOD (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMFG dropped -77.26% vs AOD's -72.26%.

AOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMFG and AOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer