PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMEA.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMEA.L achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SMEA.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 10.22%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.


SMEA.L

1D
0.75%
1M
3.62%
YTD
6.71%
6M
8.81%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
10.22%

CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
8.13%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMEA.L
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.71%25.88%3.68%13.36%-3.48%16.94%2.44%19.63%-9.48%14.91%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SMEA.L and CMU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011

0.80

The correlation between SMEA.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMEA.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

23.3%
21.8%

Industrials

19.7%
15.7%

Healthcare

13.1%
4.2%

Technology

8.6%
30.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
10.1%

Basic Materials

5.6%
2.8%

Energy

5.4%
0.0%

Utilities

5.1%
5.8%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.3%

Financial Services

SMEA.L
23.3%
CMU.L
21.8%

Industrials

SMEA.L
19.7%
CMU.L
15.7%

Healthcare

SMEA.L
13.1%
CMU.L
4.2%

Technology

SMEA.L
8.6%
CMU.L
30.8%

Consumer Defensive

SMEA.L
8.4%
CMU.L
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SMEA.L
6.3%
CMU.L
10.1%

Basic Materials

SMEA.L
5.6%
CMU.L
2.8%

Energy

SMEA.L
5.4%
CMU.L
0.0%

Utilities

SMEA.L
5.1%
CMU.L
5.8%

Communication Services

SMEA.L
3.7%
CMU.L
2.3%

Real Estate

SMEA.L
0.8%
CMU.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMEA.L
SMEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SMEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMEA.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.58

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

9.67

-3.16

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMEA.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMEA.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.98

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.66

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.65

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.49

+0.11

Drawdowns

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMEA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMEA.L and CMU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMEA.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.48%

-32.53%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-11.43%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.46%

-11.95%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.76%

-21.11%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.48%

-31.41%

+2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.18%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-5.80%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.05%

-0.09%

Volatility

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) is 3.91%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that SMEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMEA.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

5.34%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

12.44%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

14.86%

-2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.64%

16.00%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

16.78%

-1.74%

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMEA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMEA.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMEA.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SMEA.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMEA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMEA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.

SMEA.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMEA.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMEA.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer