SMDX vs. RB
SMDX (Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMDX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Intech, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. SMDX is actively managed, while RB is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMDX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.
Performance
SMDX vs. RB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMDX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.76% return.
SMDX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMDX vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMDX Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF | 13.72% | 9.87% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 6.76% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMDX and RB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMDX vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank
SMDX
RB
SMDX vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMDX | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMDX | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 3.15 | -2.05 |
Drawdowns
SMDX vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDX drawdown since its inception was -14.52%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDX and RB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMDX | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -1.70% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.47% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -0.41% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility
SMDX vs. RB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMDX | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.56% | 6.21% | +10.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 6.21% | +14.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 6.21% | +14.98% |
SMDX vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMDX vs. RB - Dividend Comparison
SMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than RB's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 2.00% | 1.78% |
SMDX Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF | 0.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMDX and RB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMDX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMDX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.
RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.53% for SMDX.
SMDX is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Intech and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMDX and 0.58% for RB.
Find the right allocation for SMDX and RB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer