PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMDMX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMDMX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Maryland Municipal Income Fund (SMDMX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMDMX achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 15.53% return.


SMDMX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.77%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.55%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
1.00%
10Y*
1.97%

FTIHX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.76%
YTD
15.53%
6M
18.30%
1Y
33.42%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMDMX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMDMX
Fidelity Maryland Municipal Income Fund
1.05%5.86%1.57%6.21%-9.56%1.62%3.79%7.17%0.27%5.92%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
15.53%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%25.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SMDMX and FTIHX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016

0.06

Over the past year, SMDMX and FTIHX have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMDMX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMDMX
SMDMX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SMDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMDMX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Maryland Municipal Income Fund (SMDMX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMDMXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.43

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.93

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.91

11.54

-4.63

SMDMX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDMX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMDMXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.31

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.58

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.63

+0.43

Drawdowns

SMDMX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDMX drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDMX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMDMXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-35.75%

+21.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-11.25%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.61%

-13.15%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.13%

-29.99%

+15.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

0.00%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-7.22%

+5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.85%

-1.83%

Volatility

SMDMX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Maryland Municipal Income Fund (SMDMX) is 1.11%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that SMDMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMDMXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

4.76%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

12.02%

-9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73%

14.30%

-11.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.87%

15.27%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.82%

16.05%

-12.23%

SMDMX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDMX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMDMX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

SMDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than FTIHX's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.41%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%0.00%
SMDMX
Fidelity Maryland Municipal Income Fund
2.55%3.39%2.76%2.38%1.53%2.04%2.49%2.42%2.30%3.06%2.95%3.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMDMX and FTIHX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SMDMX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDMX dropped -14.13% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

SMDMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMDMX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer