PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMDIX vs. GTSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMDIX vs. GTSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund (SMDIX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMDIX achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than GTSGX's -1.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMDIX having a 10.81% annualized return and GTSGX not far behind at 10.41%.


SMDIX

1D
1.15%
1M
3.44%
YTD
15.46%
6M
16.00%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
10.81%

GTSGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.74%
YTD
-1.68%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
-0.33%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMDIX vs. GTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMDIX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund
15.46%7.45%15.41%12.69%-12.44%26.06%9.17%28.05%-11.03%15.58%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
-1.68%1.62%10.24%26.51%-13.60%26.31%9.45%33.53%-1.60%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SMDIX and GTSGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2006

0.92

The correlation between SMDIX and GTSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMDIX vs. GTSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMDIX
SMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMDIX vs. GTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund (SMDIX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMDIXGTSGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

0.06

+2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

0.20

+2.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.02

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

0.08

+3.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.90

0.19

+14.72

SMDIX vs. GTSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the GTSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDIX and GTSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMDIXGTSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

0.06

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.38

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.58

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.15

+0.38

Drawdowns

SMDIX vs. GTSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDIX drawdown since its inception was -48.26%, smaller than the maximum GTSGX drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDIX and GTSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMDIXGTSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.26%

-73.82%

+25.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-11.99%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.25%

-19.63%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.87%

-21.94%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.70%

-38.25%

-2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.49%

+7.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

-29.69%

+23.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

4.83%

-2.92%

Volatility

SMDIX vs. GTSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund (SMDIX) is 3.20%, while Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that SMDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMDIXGTSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

4.05%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

10.12%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.63%

14.70%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.43%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

18.07%

-0.10%

SMDIX vs. GTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than GTSGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMDIX vs. GTSGX - Dividend Comparison

SMDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%, more than GTSGX's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.43%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%
SMDIX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund
8.54%9.86%8.53%1.69%3.28%15.04%0.32%0.91%2.45%1.51%1.72%11.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMDIX and GTSGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTSGX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to SMDIX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDIX dropped -48.26% vs GTSGX's -73.82%.

SMDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMDIX and GTSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer