SMDD vs. QTAP
SMDD (ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SMDD is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMDD returned -30.05%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for QTAP. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. SMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
SMDD vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMDD achieves a -36.25% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 12.75% return.
SMDD
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- YTD
- -36.25%
- 6M
- -32.21%
- 1Y
- -48.94%
- 3Y*
- -38.79%
- 5Y*
- -30.05%
- 10Y*
- -40.87%
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- —
SMDD vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMDD ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 | -36.25% | -27.46% | -31.02% | -38.37% | 7.69% | -33.42% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 12.75% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMDD and QTAP is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021 | -0.68 |
The correlation between SMDD and QTAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.68 (5 years) to -0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMDD vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
SMDD
QTAP
SMDD vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMDD | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.89 | -1.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 8.59 | -9.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | 48.57 | -50.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMDD vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDD and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMDD | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -29.44% | -70.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.54% | -2.49% | -48.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.99% | -13.03% | -68.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.81% | -29.44% | -58.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -1.77% | -98.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.96% | -4.99% | -87.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.20% | 0.44% | +28.76% |
Volatility
SMDD vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 3.03%. This indicates that SMDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMDD | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.01% | 3.03% | +10.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.56% | 4.94% | +30.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.65% | 6.09% | +41.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.88% | 18.92% | +39.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.35% | 18.71% | +44.64% |
SMDD vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMDD vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
SMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMDD ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 | 7.31% | 4.96% | 4.09% | 3.86% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 1.51% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMDD and QTAP have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMDD has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to QTAP (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDD dropped -99.99% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 12.66% vs -30.05% for SMDD. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 12.66% return vs -30.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMDD.
SMDD has the higher dividend yield at 7.31%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMDD and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMDD and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer