SMCZ vs. MSTX
SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) and MSTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while MSTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCZ returned -91.81% vs -94.32% for MSTX. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.29% expense ratio.
Performance
SMCZ vs. MSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -91.11% return, which is significantly lower than MSTX's -47.35% return.
SMCZ
- 1D
- -14.09%
- 1M
- -81.22%
- YTD
- -91.11%
- 6M
- -89.47%
- 1Y
- -91.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTX
- 1D
- -18.07%
- 1M
- -44.62%
- YTD
- -47.35%
- 6M
- -64.81%
- 1Y
- -94.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCZ vs. MSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | -91.11% | -61.04% |
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | -47.35% | -86.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCZ and MSTX is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCZ vs. MSTX — Risk / Return Rank
SMCZ
MSTX
SMCZ vs. MSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMCZ | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | -0.68 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | -1.90 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.80 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | -0.98 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.05 | -1.26 | -0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCZ | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | -0.68 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | -0.40 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
SMCZ vs. MSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTX drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and MSTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCZ | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.40% | -98.66% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.74% | -96.62% | +4.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.40% | -98.38% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.64% | -69.88% | -5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.02% | 75.01% | -29.99% |
Volatility
SMCZ vs. MSTX - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 77.95% compared to Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) at 39.23%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCZ | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 77.95% | 39.23% | +38.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 131.14% | 111.76% | +19.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.54% | 139.45% | +17.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.32% | 167.29% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.32% | 167.29% | -3.97% |
SMCZ vs. MSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SMCZ and MSTX have an expense ratio of 1.29%.
Dividends
SMCZ vs. MSTX - Dividend Comparison
SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.85%, while MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 41.01% |
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | 22.85% | 2.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCZ and MSTX have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCZ has higher volatility (77.95%) compared to MSTX (39.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs MSTX's -98.66%.
On 1-year performance, SMCZ leads with -91.81% vs -94.32% for MSTX. Both ETFs have the same 1.29% expense ratio. On volatility, MSTX has been the lower-risk option at 39.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMCZ has performed better with a -91.81% return vs -94.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMCZ and MSTX have the same expense ratio: 1.29% per year.
SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 22.85%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.
SMCZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MSTX is Leveraged Equities.
SMCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCZ and MSTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer