SMCX vs. QTAP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SMCX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCX returned -94.40% vs 20.69% for QTAP. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

SMCX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF (SMCX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCX achieves a -73.25% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.89% return.

SMCX

• 1D: -16.67%
• 1M: -35.24%
• 6M: -72.98%
• YTD: -73.25%
• 1Y: -94.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 13.32%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 1Y: 20.69%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 12.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF	-73.25%	-69.78%	-90.42%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	13.89%	19.36%	6.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCX and QTAP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024	0.47

Return for Risk

SMCX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCX

SMCX Risk / Return Rank: 3
SMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
SMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
SMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF (SMCX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMCX	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	3.34	-3.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	5.37	-6.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.81	-0.92
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	8.34	-9.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	42.65	-43.91

SMCX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCX and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMCX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCX drawdown since its inception was -99.23%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCX and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCX	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.23%	-29.44%	-69.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.58%	-2.49%	-93.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.23%	-0.78%	-98.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.48%	-4.94%	-83.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	74.56%	0.49%	+74.07%

Volatility

SMCX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF (SMCX) has a higher volatility of 52.15% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.45%. This indicates that SMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCX	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	52.15%	2.45%	+49.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	179.65%	5.24%	+174.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	173.00%	6.23%	+166.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.27%	18.92%	+184.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.27%	18.62%	+184.65%

SMCX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

SMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.39%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%
SMCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF	16.39%	4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCX and QTAP in my portfolio?

SMCX and QTAP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCX or QTAP?

SMCX has higher volatility (52.15%) compared to QTAP (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCX dropped -99.23% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, SMCX or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 20.69% vs -94.40% for SMCX. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMCX or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 20.69% return vs -94.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMCX or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMCX or QTAP?

SMCX has the higher dividend yield at 16.39%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between SMCX and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCX and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.