PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCWX vs. YASLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCWX vs. YASLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCWX achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than YASLX's 16.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCWX has underperformed YASLX with an annualized return of 9.91%, while YASLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.


SMCWX

1D
-0.46%
1M
1.38%
YTD
12.27%
6M
12.27%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
9.91%

YASLX

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.72%
YTD
16.77%
6M
14.87%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCWX vs. YASLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
12.27%14.07%2.33%18.86%-29.90%10.14%37.46%30.79%-9.75%26.85%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
16.77%6.27%11.23%3.65%-13.59%24.45%12.82%17.07%-10.15%34.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCWX and YASLX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.64

The correlation between SMCWX and YASLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCWX vs. YASLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCWX
SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

YASLX
YASLX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
YASLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YASLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
YASLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
YASLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
YASLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCWX vs. YASLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMCWXYASLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.72

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

4.92

+3.58

SMCWX vs. YASLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the YASLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCWX and YASLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCWXYASLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.60

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.25

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.76

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.62

-0.03

Drawdowns

SMCWX vs. YASLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCWX drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than YASLX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCWX and YASLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCWXYASLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-38.91%

-23.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-10.18%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-16.65%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.79%

-27.74%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.79%

-38.91%

-0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.71%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-8.22%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.54%

-0.59%

Volatility

SMCWX vs. YASLX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) at 2.74%. This indicates that SMCWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YASLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCWXYASLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

2.74%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

8.56%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

10.99%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

16.32%

+1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

15.02%

+2.87%

SMCWX vs. YASLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCWX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than YASLX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCWX vs. YASLX - Dividend Comparison

SMCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, while YASLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
4.32%4.84%0.60%0.64%0.00%9.24%1.60%4.24%7.06%4.48%0.35%6.49%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%15.82%8.97%0.94%3.85%2.62%12.95%9.89%4.86%3.28%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCWX and YASLX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCWX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to YASLX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCWX dropped -62.46% vs YASLX's -38.91%.

YASLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCWX and YASLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer