FWWFX vs. FNORX

In the year-to-date period, FWWFX achieves a -2.93% return, which is significantly lower than FNORX's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FWWFX has underperformed FNORX with an annualized return of 4.44%, while FNORX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.90% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FWWFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FNORX's 0.92% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX) and Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FWWFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the FNORX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWWFX and FNORX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FWWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than FNORX's 3.63% yield.

The maximum FWWFX drawdown since its inception was -55.76%, smaller than the maximum FNORX drawdown of -68.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWWFX and FNORX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Fidelity Nordic Fund (FNORX) at 4.10%. This indicates that FWWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.