PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCWX vs. ABALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCWX vs. ABALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCWX achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than ABALX's 9.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SMCWX having a 9.91% annualized return and ABALX not far ahead at 10.07%.


SMCWX

1D
-0.46%
1M
1.38%
YTD
12.27%
6M
12.27%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
9.91%

ABALX

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.87%
YTD
9.47%
6M
10.29%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCWX vs. ABALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
12.27%14.07%2.33%18.86%-29.90%10.14%37.46%30.79%-9.75%26.85%
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
9.47%18.45%14.63%13.65%-12.13%15.75%10.85%18.60%-3.35%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCWX and ABALX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 1990

0.76

The correlation between SMCWX and ABALX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCWX vs. ABALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCWX
SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ABALX
ABALX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ABALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ABALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCWX vs. ABALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMCWXABALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.53

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.49

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

15.74

-7.24

SMCWX vs. ABALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the ABALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCWX and ABALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCWXABALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.81

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.90

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.95

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.81

-0.23

Drawdowns

SMCWX vs. ABALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCWX drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than ABALX's maximum drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCWX and ABALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCWXABALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-40.20%

-22.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-7.03%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-10.68%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.79%

-18.76%

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.79%

-22.34%

-17.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.46%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-3.85%

-11.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.55%

+1.40%

Volatility

SMCWX vs. ABALX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) at 2.71%. This indicates that SMCWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCWXABALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

2.71%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

6.82%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

8.73%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

10.49%

+7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

10.67%

+7.22%

SMCWX vs. ABALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCWX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ABALX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCWX vs. ABALX - Dividend Comparison

SMCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than ABALX's 7.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
7.58%8.27%6.87%2.05%2.30%4.30%4.35%3.49%5.49%4.72%4.24%5.60%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
4.32%4.84%0.60%0.64%0.00%9.24%1.60%4.24%7.06%4.48%0.35%6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCWX and ABALX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCWX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to ABALX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCWX dropped -62.46% vs ABALX's -40.20%.

ABALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCWX and ABALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer