PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCP vs. RB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCP vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMCP

1D
-0.30%
1M
-25.99%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RB

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.63%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCP vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMCP and RB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCP vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMCP vs. RB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCPRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.43

3.15

-4.58

Drawdowns

SMCP vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCP drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCP and RB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCPRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.86%

-1.70%

-26.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

-0.47%

-25.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-0.41%

-4.92%

Volatility

SMCP vs. RB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCPRBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.62%

6.21%

+37.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.62%

6.21%

+37.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.62%

6.21%

+37.41%

SMCP vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCP vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMCP and RB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.

SMCP is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. SMCP tracks Actively Managed, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: AlphaMark Advisors and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SMCP and 0.58% for RB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCP and RB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer