RB vs. SYZ
RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and SYZ (Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000, while SYZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Lazard. RB is passively managed, while SYZ is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SYZ.
Performance
RB vs. SYZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RB achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than SYZ's 18.73% return.
RB
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.04%
SYZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 18.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RB vs. SYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 7.65% | 8.01% |
SYZ Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF | 18.73% | 0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between RB and SYZ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RB vs. SYZ — Risk / Return Rank
RB
SYZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RB vs. SYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF (SYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RB | SYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.02 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RB vs. SYZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -2.09%, smaller than the maximum SYZ drawdown of -8.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and SYZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RB | SYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -8.00% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -3.19% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -1.99% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | — | — |
Volatility
RB vs. SYZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RB | SYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.56% | 16.57% | -10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 16.57% | -10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 16.57% | -10.13% |
RB vs. SYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SYZ's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RB vs. SYZ - Dividend Comparison
RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than SYZ's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 2.28% | 1.78% |
SYZ Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RB and SYZ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SYZ.
RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.24% for SYZ.
RB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SYZ is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.60% for SYZ.
Find the right allocation for RB and SYZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer