SMCP vs. OMFL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).

SMCP and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMCP is a passively managed fund by AlphaMark Advisors that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on Apr 20, 2015. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both SMCP and OMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SMCP vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMCP vs. OMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF	0.00%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	-3.53%

Returns By Period

SMCP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMFL

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: -0.31%
• 6M: 1.50%
• 1Y: 13.96%
• 3Y*: 10.17%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCP vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.

SMCP

AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF

OMFL

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Return for Risk

SMCP vs. OMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFL

OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 47
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCP vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMCP	OMFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.63	—

Dividends

SMCP vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	0.85%	0.80%	1.22%	1.37%	1.55%	0.95%	1.48%	1.53%	1.39%	0.32%

Drawdowns

SMCP vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum OMFL drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCP and OMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCP	OMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-33.24%	+33.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.14%	+4.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-4.89%	+4.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMCP	OMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	16.71%	-16.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	16.81%	-16.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	20.25%	-20.25%