SMCP vs. ASCE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMCP (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMCP is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

SMCP vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMCP

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -25.99%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASCE

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 22.25%
• 6M: 21.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCP vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF	-25.99%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	13.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCP and ASCE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026	0.23

Return for Risk

SMCP vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMCP	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.43	1.92	-3.35

Drawdowns

SMCP vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCP drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCP and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCP	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.86%	-9.22%	-18.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.99%	-0.38%	-25.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-2.10%	-3.23%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMCP	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.62%	19.25%	+24.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.62%	19.25%	+24.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.62%	19.25%	+24.37%

SMCP vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCP vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.

Position	TTM	2025
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.18%	0.22%
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCP and ASCE in my portfolio?

SMCP and ASCE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMCP or ASCE?

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMCP or ASCE?

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMCP or ASCE?

ASCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.

What is the main difference between SMCP and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: AlphaMark Advisors and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SMCP and 0.38% for ASCE.