SMCF vs. XMVM
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM).
SMCF and XMVM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMCF is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. XMVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. Both SMCF and XMVM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SMCF vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMCF vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 6.42% | 9.56% | 16.30% | 4.47% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 2.15% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 4.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCF achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 2.15% return.
SMCF
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMVM
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 26.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMCF vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMCF vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
SMCF
XMVM
SMCF vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMCF | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.26 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 1.85 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.96 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 7.24 | -1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCF | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.26 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.42 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCF and XMVM is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMCF vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
SMCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than XMVM's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 3.68% | 3.91% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 2.07% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Drawdowns
SMCF vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCF drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCF and XMVM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCF | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -62.83% | +34.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.56% | -13.61% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -6.32% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -10.34% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 3.68% | +0.49% |
Volatility
SMCF vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) is 4.02%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that SMCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMCF | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 4.49% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 11.40% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.41% | 20.97% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 21.79% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 22.81% | -1.97% |