SMCF vs. CLOD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SMCF (Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF) and CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCF is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CLOD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cloud Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMCF returned 32.62% vs -8.67% for CLOD. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CLOD.

Performance

SMCF vs. CLOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCF achieves a 17.06% return, which is significantly higher than CLOD's -8.39% return.

SMCF

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 17.06%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 32.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOD

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: -8.39%
• 6M: -9.76%
• 1Y: -8.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCF vs. CLOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF	17.06%	9.56%	16.30%	1.75%
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	-8.39%	7.53%	21.03%	0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCF and CLOD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.43

The correlation between SMCF and CLOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMCF vs. CLOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMCF	CLOD
Financial Services	48.8%	0.8%
Energy	17.1%	-
Technology	13.0%	81.5%
Industrials	9.1%	1.3%
Healthcare	4.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	6.8%
Communication Services	1.6%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	0.7%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMCF vs. CLOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCF

SMCF Risk / Return Rank: 72
SMCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SMCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SMCF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SMCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SMCF Martin Ratio Rank: 71

CLOD

CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 6
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCF vs. CLOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMCF	CLOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	-0.34	+2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	-0.30	+3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	0.96	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	-0.28	+4.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	-0.59	+12.89

SMCF vs. CLOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCF Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the CLOD Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCF and CLOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMCF vs. CLOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCF drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, smaller than the maximum CLOD drawdown of -31.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCF and CLOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCF	CLOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.48%	-31.36%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-31.36%	+24.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-17.33%	+17.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-7.62%	+2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	14.63%	-11.97%

Volatility

SMCF vs. CLOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) is 3.23%, while Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) has a volatility of 11.59%. This indicates that SMCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCF	CLOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.23%	11.59%	-8.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.86%	22.32%	-12.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.10%	25.74%	-9.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.21%	24.54%	-4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.21%	24.54%	-4.33%

SMCF vs. CLOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCF vs. CLOD - Dividend Comparison

SMCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than CLOD's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	1.60%	1.47%	0.00%
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF	3.34%	3.91%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCF and CLOD in my portfolio?

SMCF and CLOD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCF or CLOD?

CLOD has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to SMCF (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCF dropped -28.48% vs CLOD's -31.36%.

Which ETF is better, SMCF or CLOD?

On 1-year performance, SMCF leads with 32.62% vs -8.67% for CLOD. On fees, SMCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SMCF has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMCF or CLOD?

Over the 1-year period, SMCF has performed better with a 32.62% return vs -8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMCF or CLOD?

SMCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CLOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMCF or CLOD?

SMCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 1.60% for CLOD.

What is the main difference between SMCF and CLOD?

SMCF is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while CLOD is Technology Equities. SMCF tracks Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CLOD tracks Solactive Cloud Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SMCF and 0.35% for CLOD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.