SMBPX vs. PRTBX
SMBPX (Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio) and PRTBX (Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, SMBPX returned -0.15%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for PRTBX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMBPX charges 3.16%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PRTBX.
Performance
SMBPX vs. PRTBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, SMBPX has underperformed PRTBX with an annualized return of -0.15%, while PRTBX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.26% annualized return.
SMBPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
PRTBX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 1.26%
SMBPX vs. PRTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMBPX Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.00% | 2.92% | -0.11% | 1.84% | -2.57% | -1.39% | 0.77% | 1.00% | -2.38% | 2.12% |
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio | 0.76% | 4.19% | 4.12% | 3.79% | -2.28% | -0.74% | 0.10% | 1.76% | 1.16% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMBPX and PRTBX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, SMBPX and PRTBX have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMBPX vs. PRTBX — Risk / Return Rank
SMBPX
PRTBX
SMBPX vs. PRTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) and Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMBPX | PRTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.91 | 4.64 | -1.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.57 | 8.62 | -3.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.09 | 2.23 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.52 | 10.12 | -3.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.86 | 49.14 | -33.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMBPX | PRTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 4.64 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 1.65 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | 1.46 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 3.89 | -3.02 |
Drawdowns
SMBPX vs. PRTBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMBPX drawdown since its inception was -9.99%, which is greater than PRTBX's maximum drawdown of -5.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMBPX and PRTBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMBPX | PRTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -5.13% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.69% | -0.32% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.48% | -0.44% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.52% | -3.70% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.99% | -4.36% | -5.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -0.02% | -2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -0.96% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.07% | +0.21% |
Volatility
SMBPX vs. PRTBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) is 0.00%, while Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) has a volatility of 0.15%. This indicates that SMBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMBPX | PRTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 0.15% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.39% | 0.40% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43% | 0.68% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 1.21% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.96% | 0.86% | +1.10% |
SMBPX vs. PRTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMBPX has a 3.16% expense ratio, which is higher than PRTBX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMBPX vs. PRTBX - Dividend Comparison
SMBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than PRTBX's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio | 3.36% | 3.39% | 2.69% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 1.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMBPX Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.69% | 2.69% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.36% | 0.23% | 4.23% | 1.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMBPX and PRTBX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRTBX has higher volatility (0.15%) compared to SMBPX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMBPX dropped -9.99% vs PRTBX's -5.13%.
PRTBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.64 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMBPX and PRTBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer