SMB vs. MMMA
SMB (VanEck Short Muni ETF) and MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. SMB is passively managed, while MMMA is actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SMB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MMMA.
Performance
SMB vs. MMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMB achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than MMMA's 2.42% return.
SMB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.01%
MMMA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $111.36K | $97.19K | $48.83K | |
| $770.61K | $950.10K | $1.02M |
SMB vs. MMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMB VanEck Short Muni ETF | 0.39% | 0.64% |
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 2.42% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMB and MMMA is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMB vs. MMMA — Risk / Return Rank
SMB
MMMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMB vs. MMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMB | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMB vs. MMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMB drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, which is greater than MMMA's maximum drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMB and MMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMB | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.64% | -2.79% | -9.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -1.65% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -0.60% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | — | — |
Volatility
SMB vs. MMMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMB | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64% | 4.04% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 4.04% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 4.04% | +0.21% |
SMB vs. MMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MMMA's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMB vs. MMMA - Dividend Comparison
SMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than MMMA's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 2.69% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMB VanEck Short Muni ETF | 2.53% | 2.63% | 2.38% | 1.83% | 1.32% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.58% | 1.49% | 1.23% | 1.12% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMB and MMMA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MMMA.
MMMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.53% for SMB.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and NYLI. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMB and 0.35% for MMMA.
Find the right allocation for SMB and MMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer