PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMB vs. VTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMB vs. VTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) and Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMB achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than VTES's 0.66% return.


SMB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.55%
6M
1.25%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*
1.51%

VTES

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.02%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMB vs. VTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMB
VanEck Short Muni ETF
0.55%4.61%2.41%3.56%
VTES
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares
0.66%4.19%1.85%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SMB and VTES is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023

0.57

The correlation between SMB and VTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMB vs. VTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMB
SMB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VTES
VTES Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTES Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTES Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMB vs. VTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) and Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMBVTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.70

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.48

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

7.36

+1.84

SMB vs. VTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the VTES Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMB and VTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMBVTESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.94

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.81

-1.39

Drawdowns

SMB vs. VTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMB drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, which is greater than VTES's maximum drawdown of -2.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMB and VTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMBVTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-2.42%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.17%

-1.47%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.80%

-1.80%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.62%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-0.50%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.49%

-0.08%

Volatility

SMB vs. VTES - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) has a higher volatility of 0.42% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) at 0.35%. This indicates that SMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMBVTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

0.35%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.20%

0.97%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64%

1.24%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.48%

1.72%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

1.72%

+2.54%

SMB vs. VTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTES's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMB vs. VTES - Dividend Comparison

SMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than VTES's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMB
VanEck Short Muni ETF
2.70%2.63%2.38%1.83%1.32%1.24%1.50%1.58%1.49%1.23%1.12%1.13%
VTES
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares
2.75%2.77%2.99%2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMB and VTES have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMB has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to VTES (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMB dropped -12.64% vs VTES's -2.42%.

On 3-year performance, SMB leads with 3.62% vs 3.23% for VTES. On fees, VTES is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SMB has performed better with a 3.62% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTES is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMB.

VTES has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.70% for SMB.

SMB tracks Bloomberg AMT-Free Short Continuous, while VTES tracks S&P 0-7 Yr National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMB and 0.07% for VTES.

VTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMB and VTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer