SMB vs. FMUN
SMB (VanEck Short Muni ETF) and FMUN (Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. SMB is passively managed, while FMUN is actively managed. Over the past year, SMB returned 3.87% vs 7.24% for FMUN. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMUN.
Performance
SMB vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMB achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than FMUN's 1.63% return.
SMB
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
FMUN
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 7.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMB vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMB VanEck Short Muni ETF | 0.61% | 5.10% |
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF | 1.63% | 4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMB and FMUN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMB vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank
SMB
FMUN
SMB vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMB | FMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.50 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 2.27 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.34 | 7.49 | +1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMB | FMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.34 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.27 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
SMB vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMB drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, which is greater than FMUN's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMB and FMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMB | FMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.64% | -3.21% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | -3.21% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.72% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -0.82% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 0.97% | -0.56% |
Volatility
SMB vs. FMUN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) is 0.42%, while Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that SMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMB | FMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 1.27% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.20% | 2.27% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64% | 3.12% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 4.06% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 4.06% | +0.20% |
SMB vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMB vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison
SMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than FMUN's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF | 3.29% | 2.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMB VanEck Short Muni ETF | 2.69% | 2.63% | 2.38% | 1.83% | 1.32% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.58% | 1.49% | 1.23% | 1.12% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMB and FMUN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMUN has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to SMB (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMB dropped -12.64% vs FMUN's -3.21%.
On 1-year performance, FMUN leads with 7.24% vs 3.87% for SMB. On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMUN has performed better with a 7.24% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMB.
FMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.69% for SMB.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMB and 0.05% for FMUN.
SMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMB and FMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer