SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO
SMAX.TO (Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMAX.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while CHPS.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. SMAX.TO is actively managed, while CHPS.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, SMAX.TO returned 35.90% vs 123.06% for CHPS.TO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CHPS.TO.
Performance
SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMAX.TO achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS.TO's 60.68% return.
SMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 35.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS.TO
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 60.68%
- 6M
- 61.37%
- 1Y
- 123.06%
- 3Y*
- 47.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 14.89% | 13.56% | 34.57% | 6.14% |
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 60.68% | 45.93% | 20.38% | 28.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMAX.TO and CHPS.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SMAX.TO and CHPS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
Communication Services
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Financial Services
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Industrials
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Healthcare
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Real Estate
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Utilities
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Basic Materials
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Energy
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO
SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMAX.TO | CHPS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.53 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 9.12 | -4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.38 | 26.48 | -10.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, smaller than the maximum CHPS.TO drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMAX.TO and CHPS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMAX.TO | CHPS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.88% | -48.16% | +29.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.33% | -13.35% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -3.22% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -13.88% | +11.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 4.55% | -2.41% |
Volatility
SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) is 6.14%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that SMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMAX.TO | CHPS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 15.67% | -9.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.10% | 27.93% | -17.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 34.16% | -21.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 34.50% | -19.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 34.50% | -19.88% |
SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS.TO's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMAX.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Dividend Comparison
SMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.86%, more than CHPS.TO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.53% | 0.97% | 0.01% |
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 9.86% | 10.50% | 10.11% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMAX.TO and CHPS.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS.TO is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS.TO is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMAX.TO.
SMAX.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHPS.TO is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SMAX.TO and 0.63% for CHPS.TO.
Find the right allocation for SMAX.TO and CHPS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer