SMARX vs. SCCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) and Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX).
SMARX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 3, 2005. SCCPX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011.
Performance
SMARX vs. SCCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMARX vs. SCCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust | -0.18% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 9.76% | -11.77% | 0.76% | 6.55% | 7.77% | -1.13% | 4.75% |
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | -1.68% | 6.37% | -1.68% | 9.20% | -23.65% | -0.01% | 625.95% | 10.78% | -0.95% | 4.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMARX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than SCCPX's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SMARX has underperformed SCCPX with an annualized return of 3.35%, while SCCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.97% annualized return.
SMARX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 3.35%
SCCPX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- 1.95%
- 3Y*
- 2.21%
- 5Y*
- -2.74%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMARX vs. SCCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMARX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCCPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMARX vs. SCCPX — Risk / Return Rank
SMARX
SCCPX
SMARX vs. SCCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) and Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMARX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.27 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 0.43 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.05 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 0.63 | +1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.69 | 1.48 | +4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMARX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.27 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.25 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.12 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.11 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMARX and SCCPX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMARX vs. SCCPX - Dividend Comparison
SMARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, which matches SCCPX's 4.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust | 4.70% | 5.02% | 4.07% | 3.85% | 3.53% | 2.57% | 3.35% | 4.19% | 4.55% | 4.20% | 4.87% | 5.24% |
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | 4.69% | 4.99% | 4.84% | 3.54% | 4.11% | 13.93% | 88.30% | 3.01% | 3.31% | 3.76% | 3.41% | 3.16% |
Drawdowns
SMARX vs. SCCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMARX drawdown since its inception was -47.07%, which is greater than SCCPX's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMARX and SCCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMARX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.07% | -31.88% | -15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.63% | -5.49% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.20% | -31.88% | +15.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.20% | -31.88% | +15.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -15.29% | +13.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -6.30% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 2.32% | -1.49% |
Volatility
SMARX vs. SCCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) is 1.66%, while Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that SMARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMARX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 3.28% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 5.17% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.03% | 8.84% | -4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 11.11% | -5.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 182.21% | -177.84% |