PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMAP vs. ROSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMAP vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMAP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROSC

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.22%
YTD
12.98%
6M
14.18%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAP vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMAP
ROSC

Industrials

22.3%
11.2%

Healthcare

17.5%
20.1%

Technology

13.9%
12.1%

Financial Services

13.1%
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
14.1%

Basic Materials

7.9%
2.5%

Energy

6.6%
3.8%

Real Estate

5.6%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
6.6%

Communication Services

-

3.6%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Industrials

SMAP
22.3%
ROSC
11.2%

Healthcare

SMAP
17.5%
ROSC
20.1%

Technology

SMAP
13.9%
ROSC
12.1%

Financial Services

SMAP
13.1%
ROSC
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SMAP
11.1%
ROSC
14.1%

Basic Materials

SMAP
7.9%
ROSC
2.5%

Energy

SMAP
6.6%
ROSC
3.8%

Real Estate

SMAP
5.6%
ROSC
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

SMAP
2.0%
ROSC
6.6%

Communication Services

SMAP

-

ROSC
3.6%

Utilities

SMAP

-

ROSC
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMAP vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAP

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAP vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMAP vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMAPROSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

Drawdowns

SMAP vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMAPROSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

Volatility

SMAP vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMAPROSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

SMAP vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMAP vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

SMAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.85%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMAP.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.00% for SMAP.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.34% for ROSC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMAP and ROSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer