SMAP vs. ROSC
SMAP (Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMAP is actively managed, while ROSC is passively managed. SMAP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
SMAP vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMAP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROSC
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 12.98%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
SMAP vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMAP
ROSC
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
SMAP
ROSC
Healthcare
SMAP
ROSC
Technology
SMAP
ROSC
Financial Services
SMAP
ROSC
Consumer Cyclical
SMAP
ROSC
Basic Materials
SMAP
ROSC
Energy
SMAP
ROSC
Real Estate
SMAP
ROSC
Consumer Defensive
SMAP
ROSC
Communication Services
SMAP
-
ROSC
Utilities
SMAP
-
ROSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMAP vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
SMAP
ROSC
SMAP vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMAP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.47 | — |
Drawdowns
SMAP vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMAP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -43.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.65% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.21% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.39% | — |
Volatility
SMAP vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMAP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.58% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 19.32% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.28% | — |
SMAP vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMAP vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
SMAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.85% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMAP.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.00% for SMAP.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.34% for ROSC.
Find the right allocation for SMAP and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer