PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMAP vs. OVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMAP vs. OVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMAP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

OVS

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.92%
6M
14.06%
YTD
22.76%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAP vs. OVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
7.23%3.63%-2.93%
OVS
Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF
22.76%6.15%1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SMAP and OVS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024

0.87

The correlation between SMAP and OVS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMAP vs. OVS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMAP
OVS

Industrials

22.3%
15.5%

Healthcare

17.5%
12.4%

Technology

13.9%
15.6%

Financial Services

13.1%
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
13.2%

Basic Materials

7.9%
4.6%

Energy

6.6%
4.8%

Real Estate

5.6%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
4.2%

Communication Services

-

3.2%

Utilities

-

1.8%

Industrials

SMAP
22.3%
OVS
15.5%

Healthcare

SMAP
17.5%
OVS
12.4%

Technology

SMAP
13.9%
OVS
15.6%

Financial Services

SMAP
13.1%
OVS
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SMAP
11.1%
OVS
13.2%

Basic Materials

SMAP
7.9%
OVS
4.6%

Energy

SMAP
6.6%
OVS
4.8%

Real Estate

SMAP
5.6%
OVS
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

SMAP
2.0%
OVS
4.2%

Communication Services

SMAP

-

OVS
3.2%

Utilities

SMAP

-

OVS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMAP vs. OVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


OVS
OVS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
OVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
OVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAP vs. OVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMAPOVSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

SMAP vs. OVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMAP vs. OVS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMAPOVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

Volatility

SMAP vs. OVS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMAPOVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

SMAP vs. OVS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than OVS's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMAP vs. OVS - Dividend Comparison

SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than OVS's 6.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OVS
Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF
6.78%3.69%4.08%3.19%3.43%4.05%1.74%0.54%
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
0.32%0.48%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMAP and OVS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMAP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMAP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for OVS.

OVS has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 0.32% for SMAP.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.83% for OVS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMAP and OVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer