OVS vs. FDG

Last updated Jun 19, 2026

OVS (Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF) and FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OVS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Liquid Strategies, while FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OVS returned 7.56%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for FDG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OVS charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDG.

Performance

OVS vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVS achieves a 21.64% return, which is significantly higher than FDG's 6.07% return.

OVS

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: 7.82%
• YTD: 21.64%
• 6M: 20.11%
• 1Y: 40.98%
• 3Y*: 16.51%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: —

FDG

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 6.07%
• 6M: 8.68%
• 1Y: 29.75%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVS vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
OVS Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF	21.64%	6.15%	11.07%	17.20%	-19.99%	30.15%	83.30%
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	6.07%	22.13%	45.89%	37.22%	-35.74%	8.52%	96.27%

Correlation

The correlation between OVS and FDG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020	0.62

The correlation between OVS and FDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OVS vs. FDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OVS	FDG
Technology	17.5%	37.7%
Financial Services	16.4%	4.7%
Industrials	15.1%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	17.1%
Healthcare	10.9%	13.2%
Real Estate	7.5%	-
Energy	5.4%	0.6%
Basic Materials	5.0%	-
Communication Services	3.7%	21.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Utilities	1.9%	0.1%

Return for Risk

OVS vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVS

OVS Risk / Return Rank: 75
OVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
OVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
OVS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
OVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
OVS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 44
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVS vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OVS	FDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.58	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	2.12	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.84	1.90	+2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.72	6.50	+9.21

OVS vs. FDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the FDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVS and FDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OVS vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVS drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVS and FDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	OVS	FDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.09%	-43.69%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-15.71%	+7.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.49%	-26.14%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.49%	-43.69%	+13.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-4.44%	+4.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.29%	-13.36%	+2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	4.59%	-1.98%

Volatility

OVS vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF (OVS) is 5.52%, while American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that OVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OVS	FDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	7.94%	-2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	15.61%	-2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.46%	18.91%	+0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.25%	24.83%	-1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.44%	24.97%	+2.47%

OVS vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVS has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

OVS vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

OVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%
OVS Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF	6.60%	3.69%	4.08%	3.19%	3.43%	4.05%	1.74%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OVS and FDG in my portfolio?

OVS and FDG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OVS or FDG?

FDG has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to OVS (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVS dropped -45.09% vs FDG's -43.69%.

Which ETF is better, OVS or FDG?

On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 11.22% vs 7.56% for OVS. On fees, FDG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, OVS has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OVS or FDG?

Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 11.22% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OVS or FDG?

FDG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for OVS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OVS or FDG?

OVS has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

What is the main difference between OVS and FDG?

OVS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FDG is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for OVS and 0.45% for FDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.