SMAP vs. CVSM
SMAP (Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMAP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.
Performance
SMAP vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMAP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CVSM
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SMAP vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 2.95% |
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMAP and CVSM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMAP vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMAP vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMAP | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.17% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.01% | — |
Volatility
SMAP vs. CVSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMAP | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.99% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 10.99% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 10.99% | — |
SMAP vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMAP vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison
SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.48% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMAP and CVSM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CVSM is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CVSM is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMAP.
SMAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.55% for CVSM.
Find the right allocation for SMAP and CVSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer