SMAP vs. COMT

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SMAP (Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMAP is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Amplify, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SMAP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

SMAP vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMAP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

COMT

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 4.27%
• 6M: 27.35%
• YTD: 31.39%
• 1Y: 33.27%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: 8.70%
• ALL TIME*: 3.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAP vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF	7.23%	3.63%	-2.93%
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF	31.39%	6.07%	1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SMAP and COMT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024	-0.01

The correlation between SMAP and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SMAP vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 56
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAP vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMAP	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.14	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.26	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SMAP	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-51.89%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.57%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-10.46%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-23.95%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMAP	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	21.59%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.10%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.85%	—

SMAP vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMAP vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than COMT's 5.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF	5.89%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF	0.32%	0.48%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMAP and COMT in my portfolio?

SMAP and COMT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMAP or COMT?

On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMAP or COMT?

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMAP or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 0.32% for SMAP.

What is the main difference between SMAP and COMT?

SMAP is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.48% for COMT.