SMAP vs. BITY
SMAP (Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) and BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMAP is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Amplify, while BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMAP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITY.
Performance
SMAP vs. BITY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMAP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BITY
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- 6M
- -30.50%
- YTD
- -23.85%
- 1Y
- -43.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.12%
SMAP vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 7.23% | 9.89% |
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | -23.85% | -7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMAP and BITY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMAP vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank
SMAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITY
SMAP vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMAP | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMAP vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMAP | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -50.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -50.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -46.02% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -22.45% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 31.34% | — |
Volatility
SMAP vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMAP | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 41.50% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 39.29% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 39.29% | — |
SMAP vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMAP vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison
SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than BITY's 38.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | 38.44% | 21.53% | 0.00% |
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.48% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMAP and BITY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMAP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMAP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.
BITY has the higher dividend yield at 38.44%, compared with 0.32% for SMAP.
SMAP is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BITY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.65% for BITY.
Find the right allocation for SMAP and BITY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer