PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMAP vs. ASCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMAP vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMAP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ASCE

1D
0.14%
1M
-2.66%
6M
18.38%
YTD
25.74%
1Y
36.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAP vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
7.23%0.43%
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
25.74%8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SMAP and ASCE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.73

The correlation between SMAP and ASCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMAP vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ASCE
ASCE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ASCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASCE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ASCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASCE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAP vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMAPASCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

SMAP vs. ASCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMAP vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMAPASCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

Volatility

SMAP vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMAPASCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

SMAP vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMAP vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than ASCE's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
0.17%0.22%0.00%
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
0.32%0.48%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMAP and ASCE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMAP.

SMAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.38% for ASCE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMAP and ASCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer