SLX vs. SIXS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) and SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLX is a Materials fund tracking the NYSE Arca Steel Index, while SIXS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. SLX is passively managed, while SIXS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLX returned 14.47%/yr vs 4.95%/yr for SIXS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLX charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SIXS.

Performance

SLX vs. SIXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 18.05% return, which is significantly higher than SIXS's 14.06% return.

SLX

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: 18.05%
• 6M: 17.21%
• 1Y: 56.97%
• 3Y*: 20.63%
• 5Y*: 14.47%
• 10Y*: 18.64%

SIXS

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 6.04%
• YTD: 14.06%
• 6M: 12.36%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 4.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLX vs. SIXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF	18.05%	47.45%	-17.94%	31.25%	14.28%	27.69%	86.34%
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	14.06%	4.59%	5.85%	14.92%	-18.52%	40.74%	44.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SLX and SIXS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between SLX and SIXS has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SLX vs. SIXS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SLX	SIXS
Basic Materials	93.2%	4.7%
Energy	3.5%	1.3%
Industrials	3.3%	8.7%
Communication Services	-	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	17.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	13.0%
Financial Services	-	12.9%
Healthcare	-	10.2%
Real Estate	-	11.7%
Technology	-	7.6%
Utilities	-	10.1%

Return for Risk

SLX vs. SIXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLX

SLX Risk / Return Rank: 75
SLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SLX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SLX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

SIXS

SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 66
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLX vs. SIXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLX	SIXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.82	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.71	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.32	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	3.48	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.66	10.44	+1.22

SLX vs. SIXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the SIXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLX and SIXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLX vs. SIXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than SIXS's maximum drawdown of -27.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and SIXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLX	SIXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.14%	-27.68%	-54.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.35%	-7.16%	-9.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.39%	-19.95%	-7.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.62%	-27.68%	-5.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.79%	0.00%	-11.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.63%	-8.87%	-29.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.90%	2.38%	+2.52%

Volatility

SLX vs. SIXS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) at 4.10%. This indicates that SLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLX	SIXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	4.10%	+5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.36%	9.21%	+10.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.23%	13.67%	+11.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.83%	17.61%	+10.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.90%	19.62%	+11.28%

SLX vs. SIXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLX vs. SIXS - Dividend Comparison

SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than SIXS's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	1.67%	1.62%	1.09%	1.60%	1.37%	0.94%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF	1.31%	1.55%	3.56%	2.80%	4.97%	7.07%	1.87%	3.44%	6.26%	2.50%	1.06%	5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLX and SIXS in my portfolio?

SLX and SIXS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLX or SIXS?

SLX has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to SIXS (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLX dropped -82.14% vs SIXS's -27.68%.

Which ETF is better, SLX or SIXS?

On 5-year performance, SLX leads with 14.47% vs 4.95% for SIXS. On fees, SLX is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, SIXS has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLX or SIXS?

Over the 5-year period, SLX has performed better with a 14.47% return vs 4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLX or SIXS?

SLX is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLX or SIXS?

SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.31% for SLX.

What is the main difference between SLX and SIXS?

SLX is categorized as Materials, while SIXS is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SLX and 1.00% for SIXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.