SLX vs. SIXS
SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) and SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLX is a Materials fund tracking the NYSE Arca Steel Index, while SIXS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. SLX is passively managed, while SIXS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLX returned 16.03%/yr vs 3.60%/yr for SIXS. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLX charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SIXS.
Performance
SLX vs. SIXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 31.70% return, which is significantly higher than SIXS's 7.00% return.
SLX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 6.72%
- YTD
- 31.70%
- 6M
- 36.25%
- 1Y
- 76.28%
- 3Y*
- 26.79%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
SIXS
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 7.00%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 18.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- —
SLX vs. SIXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 31.70% | 47.45% | -17.94% | 31.25% | 14.28% | 27.69% | 95.72% |
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 7.00% | 4.59% | 5.85% | 14.92% | -18.52% | 40.74% | 43.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLX and SIXS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SLX and SIXS shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLX vs. SIXS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLX
SIXS
Basic Materials
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SLX
SIXS
Energy
SLX
SIXS
Industrials
SLX
SIXS
Communication Services
SLX
-
SIXS
Consumer Cyclical
SLX
-
SIXS
Consumer Defensive
SLX
-
SIXS
Financial Services
SLX
-
SIXS
Healthcare
SLX
-
SIXS
Real Estate
SLX
-
SIXS
Technology
SLX
-
SIXS
Utilities
SLX
-
SIXS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLX vs. SIXS — Risk / Return Rank
SLX
SIXS
SLX vs. SIXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLX | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.25 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 2.65 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.40 | 7.95 | +8.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLX | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21 | 1.42 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.21 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.73 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
SLX vs. SIXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than SIXS's maximum drawdown of -27.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and SIXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLX | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.14% | -27.68% | -54.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.35% | -7.16% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -19.95% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.62% | -27.68% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -2.70% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.72% | -8.94% | -29.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 2.38% | +2.29% |
Volatility
SLX vs. SIXS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) has a higher volatility of 7.67% compared to 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) at 3.83%. This indicates that SLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLX | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.67% | 3.83% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 9.04% | +8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.92% | 13.36% | +10.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.72% | 17.64% | +10.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.02% | 19.66% | +11.36% |
SLX vs. SIXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLX vs. SIXS - Dividend Comparison
SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than SIXS's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.78% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 0.94% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 1.18% | 1.55% | 3.56% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 3.44% | 6.26% | 2.50% | 1.06% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLX and SIXS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLX has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to SIXS (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLX dropped -82.14% vs SIXS's -27.68%.
On 5-year performance, SLX leads with 16.03% vs 3.60% for SIXS. On fees, SLX is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, SIXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SLX has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLX is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.
SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.18% for SLX.
SLX is categorized as Materials, while SIXS is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SLX and 1.00% for SIXS.
SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLX and SIXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer