SLVRX vs. SILJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ).
SLVRX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003. SILJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Junior Silver Miners & Explorers Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2012.
Performance
SLVRX vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLVRX vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R | 0.13% | 27.32% | 12.24% | 5.25% | -1.30% | 26.02% | 5.92% | 26.26% | -12.52% | 18.96% |
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF | 7.41% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVRX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVRX has underperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 12.07%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.73% annualized return.
SLVRX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -8.87%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 24.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
SILJ
- 1D
- 8.82%
- 1M
- -26.25%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 31.14%
- 1Y
- 149.83%
- 3Y*
- 42.89%
- 5Y*
- 16.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLVRX vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLVRX vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
SLVRX
SILJ
SLVRX vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVRX | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 2.74 | -1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 2.83 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 4.26 | -2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 14.55 | -6.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVRX | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.74 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.38 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.32 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.09 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVRX and SILJ is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SLVRX vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
SLVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, more than SILJ's 1.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R | 8.48% | 8.50% | 3.27% | 3.42% | 1.15% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.83% | 4.60% | 3.92% | 8.22% | 4.27% |
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.86% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
SLVRX vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVRX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVRX and SILJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVRX | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.20% | -79.04% | +18.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -34.71% | +22.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -56.09% | +37.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.51% | -70.06% | +28.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -26.25% | +17.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -41.67% | +34.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 10.16% | -7.27% |
Volatility
SLVRX vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) is 3.73%, while ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 21.63%. This indicates that SLVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLVRX | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 21.63% | -17.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 46.79% | -37.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.96% | 54.97% | -38.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 44.07% | -28.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 46.61% | -27.93% |