PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVR vs. URNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLVR vs. URNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVR achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than URNJ's 12.14% return.


SLVR

1D
-5.47%
1M
1.96%
YTD
6.80%
6M
18.93%
1Y
118.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

URNJ

1D
-5.58%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
12.14%
6M
11.74%
1Y
63.88%
3Y*
25.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVR vs. URNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SLVR and URNJ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025

0.51

The correlation between SLVR and URNJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLVR vs. URNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVR
SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

URNJ
URNJ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
URNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
URNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVR vs. URNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVRURNJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

1.05

+0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

1.72

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.20

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.81

+1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.66

3.67

+4.00

SLVR vs. URNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the URNJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVR and URNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVRURNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.05

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.02

0.28

+1.73

Drawdowns

SLVR vs. URNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVR drawdown since its inception was -38.60%, smaller than the maximum URNJ drawdown of -59.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR and URNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVRURNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.60%

-59.21%

+20.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.60%

-35.54%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.51%

-30.10%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-21.17%

+11.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.47%

17.47%

-2.00%

Volatility

SLVR vs. URNJ - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a higher volatility of 19.31% compared to Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) at 17.63%. This indicates that SLVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVRURNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.31%

17.63%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.02%

45.59%

+5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.64%

61.42%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.85%

53.34%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.85%

53.34%

+4.51%

SLVR vs. URNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than URNJ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLVR vs. URNJ - Dividend Comparison

SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than URNJ's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
SLVR
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF
3.45%3.68%0.00%0.00%
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
5.87%6.58%4.33%4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLVR and URNJ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLVR has higher volatility (19.31%) compared to URNJ (17.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVR dropped -38.60% vs URNJ's -59.21%.

On 1-year performance, SLVR leads with 118.11% vs 63.88% for URNJ. On fees, SLVR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, URNJ has been the lower-risk option at 17.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLVR has performed better with a 118.11% return vs 63.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLVR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for URNJ.

URNJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 3.45% for SLVR.

SLVR is categorized as Silver, while URNJ is Energy Equities. SLVR tracks Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index, while URNJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SLVR and 0.80% for URNJ.

SLVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVR and URNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer