SLVP vs. SVR.TO
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) and SVR.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF) are both Silver funds from iShares - SLVP tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index while SVR.TO tracks the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVP returned 9.87%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for SVR.TO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLVP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR.TO.
Performance
SLVP vs. SVR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SLVP is traded in USD, while SVR.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -9.65% return, which is significantly higher than SVR.TO's -21.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has outperformed SVR.TO with an annualized return of 9.87%, while SVR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.82% annualized return.
SLVP
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -16.43%
- YTD
- -9.65%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- 1Y
- 76.85%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
SVR.TO
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -24.99%
- YTD
- -21.46%
- 6M
- -26.42%
- 1Y
- 51.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
SLVP vs. SVR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -9.65% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | -21.46% | 152.07% | 9.45% | 1.48% | -5.88% | -12.98% | 46.44% | 17.62% | -16.52% | 11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and SVR.TO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.65 |
The correlation between SLVP and SVR.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. SVR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
SVR.TO
SLVP vs. SVR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 0.95 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 2.14 | +2.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. SVR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, smaller than the maximum SVR.TO drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and SVR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -85.22% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -54.20% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -54.20% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.01% | -54.20% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -54.20% | -7.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.83% | -52.24% | +17.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.74% | -59.57% | +12.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.80% | 23.98% | -8.18% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. SVR.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 19.38% compared to iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO) at 16.52%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.38% | 16.52% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.84% | 57.96% | -12.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.46% | 60.36% | -4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.37% | 37.53% | +5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.51% | 33.40% | +9.11% |
SLVP vs. SVR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVP vs. SVR.TO - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while SVR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.28% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and SVR.TO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR.TO.
SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while SVR.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.66% for SVR.TO.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and SVR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer