SLVP vs. ONDS
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while ONDS (Ondas Holdings Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SLVP returned 14.15%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for ONDS. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLVP vs. ONDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than ONDS's -4.41% return.
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -21.72%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 83.53%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
ONDS
- 1D
- -5.09%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 445.61%
- 3Y*
- 104.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- —
SLVP vs. ONDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | 0.46% |
ONDS Ondas Holdings Inc. | -4.41% | 281.25% | 67.32% | -3.77% | -76.30% | -28.08% | -48.17% | 0.00% | 33.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and ONDS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. ONDS — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
ONDS
SLVP vs. ONDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | ONDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 8.42 | -6.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 18.67 | -12.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. ONDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, smaller than the maximum ONDS drawdown of -98.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and ONDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | ONDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -98.28% | +17.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -53.37% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -83.28% | +45.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.26% | -96.99% | +42.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.74% | -52.15% | +20.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.78% | -71.41% | +24.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.31% | 24.01% | -9.70% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. ONDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is 19.61%, while Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) has a volatility of 44.08%. This indicates that SLVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | ONDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.61% | 44.08% | -24.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.17% | 78.27% | -33.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 127.45% | -72.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 113.81% | -70.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.45% | 120.73% | -78.28% |
Dividends
SLVP vs. ONDS - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while ONDS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONDS Ondas Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and ONDS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONDS has higher volatility (44.08%) compared to SLVP (19.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs ONDS's -98.28%.
ONDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and ONDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer