PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVP vs. ETON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLVP vs. ETON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than ETON's 86.81% return.


SLVP

1D
3.38%
1M
-21.72%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
83.53%
3Y*
48.97%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
12.67%

ETON

1D
-1.62%
1M
2.50%
YTD
86.81%
6M
89.16%
1Y
117.71%
3Y*
102.22%
5Y*
36.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVP vs. ETON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
-5.37%202.84%14.47%-2.31%-18.06%-23.53%56.45%37.71%11.40%
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc
86.81%26.95%204.11%55.32%-34.27%-47.23%12.92%17.65%-4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVP and ETON is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2018

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLVP vs. ETON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVP
SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ETON
ETON Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ETON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETON Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ETON Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETON Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVP vs. ETON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLVPETONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.27

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.86

6.73

-0.88

SLVP vs. ETON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the ETON Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVP and ETON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLVP vs. ETON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, roughly equal to the maximum ETON drawdown of -79.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and ETON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVPETONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.47%

-79.94%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.06%

-36.17%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.06%

-45.65%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.26%

-70.42%

+16.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.74%

-9.74%

-22.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.78%

-37.58%

-9.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.31%

17.56%

-3.25%

Volatility

SLVP vs. ETON - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 19.61% compared to Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON) at 17.63%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVPETONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.61%

17.63%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.17%

40.49%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.53%

54.85%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.15%

63.41%

-20.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.45%

63.87%

-21.42%

Dividends

SLVP vs. ETON - Dividend Comparison

SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while ETON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
1.88%1.78%1.05%0.88%0.63%1.63%2.39%2.03%1.28%0.85%2.32%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLVP and ETON have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to ETON (17.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs ETON's -79.94%.

ETON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVP and ETON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer