SLVP vs. COPJ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ).
SLVP and COPJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLVP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. COPJ is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. Both SLVP and COPJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SLVP vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLVP vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF | 3.47% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -10.09% |
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | -0.81% | 140.63% | 11.07% | -5.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly higher than COPJ's -0.81% return.
SLVP
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- -25.36%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 31.80%
- 1Y
- 141.24%
- 3Y*
- 47.57%
- 5Y*
- 19.59%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
COPJ
- 1D
- 8.82%
- 1M
- -20.74%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 38.34%
- 1Y
- 117.56%
- 3Y*
- 37.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLVP vs. COPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than COPJ's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
COPJ
SLVP vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVP | COPJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.64 | 2.84 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 3.05 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 3.55 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.23 | 13.23 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVP | COPJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.84 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 1.01 | -0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and COPJ is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SLVP vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than COPJ's 11.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | 11.67% | 11.57% | 11.64% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, which is greater than COPJ's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and COPJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | COPJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -32.28% | -48.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.57% | -32.28% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.36% | -24.18% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.13% | -11.58% | -35.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.93% | 8.66% | +1.27% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. COPJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 19.67% compared to Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) at 18.58%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COPJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | COPJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.67% | 18.58% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.96% | 34.54% | +10.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.91% | 41.70% | +12.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.41% | 33.88% | +8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.44% | 33.88% | +8.56% |