SLVAX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund (SLVAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
SLVAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Apr 25, 1997. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
SLVAX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLVAX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVAX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund | 2.58% | 27.60% | 12.53% | 5.56% | -1.09% | 26.34% | 6.12% | 26.57% | -12.32% | 18.98% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -6.10% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVAX achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -6.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVAX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 12.45%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.80% annualized return.
SLVAX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
CTCAX
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 20.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLVAX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLVAX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
SLVAX
CTCAX
SLVAX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund (SLVAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.24 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | 1.84 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.30 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 8.07 | +1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.24 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.50 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.71 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVAX and CTCAX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SLVAX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
SLVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than CTCAX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVAX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund | 8.33% | 8.54% | 3.46% | 3.60% | 1.38% | 5.91% | 7.52% | 6.96% | 4.83% | 3.86% | 7.19% | 4.49% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.50% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
SLVAX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVAX drawdown since its inception was -60.01%, roughly equal to the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVAX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.01% | -61.04% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -14.43% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.44% | -39.55% | +21.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.50% | -39.55% | -1.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -10.51% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -10.75% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 4.12% | -1.20% |
Volatility
SLVAX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund (SLVAX) is 4.69%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that SLVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLVAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 8.94% | -4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 16.85% | -7.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 27.31% | -10.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 25.88% | -9.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 24.70% | -6.01% |