SLV vs. VYMI
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while VYMI is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 13.99%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for VYMI. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VYMI.
Performance
SLV vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than VYMI's 12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed VYMI with an annualized return of 13.99%, while VYMI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.
SLV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -22.76%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 85.39%
- 3Y*
- 41.27%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
VYMI
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
SLV vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.86% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.90% | 38.05% | 7.06% | 17.07% | -7.02% | 15.39% | -1.11% | 18.43% | -12.65% | 22.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and VYMI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2016 | 0.35 |
The correlation between SLV and VYMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLV vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLV
VYMI
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SLV
VYMI
Communication Services
SLV
-
VYMI
Consumer Cyclical
SLV
-
VYMI
Consumer Defensive
SLV
-
VYMI
Energy
SLV
-
VYMI
Financial Services
SLV
-
VYMI
Healthcare
SLV
-
VYMI
Industrials
SLV
-
VYMI
Real Estate
SLV
-
VYMI
Technology
SLV
-
VYMI
Utilities
SLV
-
VYMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
VYMI
SLV vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 2.96 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 11.60 | -7.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLV vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than VYMI's maximum drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and VYMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -40.00% | -36.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.40% | -10.14% | -35.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.40% | -12.84% | -32.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.40% | -24.05% | -21.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.40% | -40.00% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.96% | 0.00% | -41.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.66% | -6.30% | -38.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.88% | 2.59% | +18.29% |
Volatility
SLV vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 4.40%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.34% | 4.40% | +11.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.10% | 11.15% | +47.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.82% | 13.33% | +46.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.46% | 14.90% | +21.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.00% | 16.85% | +15.15% |
SLV vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 3.39% | 3.68% | 4.84% | 4.58% | 4.70% | 4.30% | 3.22% | 4.20% | 4.29% | 3.21% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and VYMI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to VYMI (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs VYMI's -40.00%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 13.99% vs 11.24% for VYMI. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SLV is categorized as Silver, while VYMI is Dividend. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.07% for VYMI.
VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and VYMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer