PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLV vs. SLVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLV vs. SLVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than SLVM's -18.20% return.


SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%

SLVM

1D
-0.39%
1M
-8.40%
YTD
-18.20%
6M
-18.26%
1Y
-24.59%
3Y*
1.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. SLVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%3.26%
SLVM
Sylvamo Corporation
-18.20%-37.06%64.70%4.21%75.25%-15.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and SLVM is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLV vs. SLVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVM
SLVM Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SLVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVM Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVM Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. SLVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVSLVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

-0.62

+2.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

-0.69

+2.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.91

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

-0.73

+3.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

-1.47

+7.11

SLV vs. SLVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the SLVM Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and SLVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVSLVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

-0.62

+2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.14

+0.11

Drawdowns

SLV vs. SLVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than SLVM's maximum drawdown of -60.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and SLVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVSLVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-60.56%

-15.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

-33.87%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

-60.56%

+18.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.30%

-57.48%

+20.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-22.40%

-22.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.67%

16.75%

+2.92%

Volatility

SLV vs. SLVM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM) at 12.62%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVSLVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.30%

12.62%

+3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.31%

26.39%

+31.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.90%

40.07%

+18.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.15%

43.78%

-7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.84%

43.78%

-11.94%

Dividends

SLV vs. SLVM - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLVM
Sylvamo Corporation
4.66%3.74%1.90%2.75%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLV and SLVM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to SLVM (12.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs SLVM's -60.56%.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLV and SLVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer