SLVM vs. DRD

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SLVM (Sylvamo Corporation) and DRD (DRDGOLD Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SLVM in Paper & Paper Products, DRD in Gold. Over the past 3 years, SLVM returned 1.39%/yr vs 34.20%/yr for DRD. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SLVM vs. DRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM) and DRDGOLD Limited (DRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVM achieves a -17.88% return, which is significantly lower than DRD's -15.73% return.

SLVM

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -11.23%
• YTD: -17.88%
• 6M: -17.16%
• 1Y: -23.63%
• 3Y*: 1.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRD

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -3.36%
• YTD: -15.73%
• 6M: -9.83%
• 1Y: 62.92%
• 3Y*: 34.20%
• 5Y*: 20.27%
• 10Y*: 21.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVM vs. DRD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SLVM Sylvamo Corporation	-17.88%	-37.06%	64.70%	4.21%	75.25%	-15.48%
DRD DRDGOLD Limited	-15.73%	267.16%	11.55%	13.26%	-7.63%	3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVM and DRD is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021	0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap SLVM : $1.55B DRD : $224.96M
EPS SLVM : $2.52 DRD : $100.99
PE Ratio SLVM : 15.39 DRD : 0.26
PEG Ratio SLVM : 2.27 DRD : 0.02
PS Ratio SLVM : 0.48 DRD : 0.08
PB Ratio SLVM : 1.58 DRD : 0.02
Total Revenue (TTM) SLVM : $3.29B DRD : $15.96B
Gross Profit (TTM) SLVM : $565.00M DRD : $6.44B
EBITDA (TTM) SLVM : $338.00M DRD : $7.17B

Return for Risk

SLVM vs. DRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVM

SLVM Risk / Return Rank: 14
SLVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
SLVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
SLVM Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SLVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SLVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6

DRD

DRD Risk / Return Rank: 71
DRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DRD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
DRD Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVM vs. DRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM) and DRDGOLD Limited (DRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLVM	DRD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	1.08	-1.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.64	1.61	-2.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.20	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	2.25	-2.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	4.75	-6.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLVM vs. DRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVM Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the DRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVM and DRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLVM	DRD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59	1.08	-1.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	-0.02	+0.16

Drawdowns

SLVM vs. DRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVM drawdown since its inception was -60.56%, smaller than the maximum DRD drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVM and DRD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVM	DRD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.56%	-98.44%	+37.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.87%	-33.72%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.56%	-45.13%	-15.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-60.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.32%	-43.19%	-14.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.37%	-81.91%	+59.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.65%	15.97%	+0.68%

Volatility

SLVM vs. DRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sylvamo Corporation (SLVM) is 13.00%, while DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) has a volatility of 18.39%. This indicates that SLVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVM	DRD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.00%	18.39%	-5.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.41%	42.65%	-16.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.07%	58.79%	-18.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.80%	51.39%	-7.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.80%	57.99%	-14.19%

Dividends

SLVM vs. DRD - Dividend Comparison

SLVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than DRD's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRD DRDGOLD Limited	2.08%	1.26%	2.53%	5.74%	5.00%	6.54%	4.47%	2.65%	2.05%	1.12%	6.15%	3.73%
SLVM Sylvamo Corporation	4.65%	3.74%	1.90%	2.75%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

SLVM vs. DRD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sylvamo Corporation and DRDGOLD Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SLVM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sylvamo Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 755.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DRD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DRDGOLD Limited reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 4.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

SLVM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sylvamo Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 755.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

DRD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DRDGOLD Limited reported an operating income of 2.20B and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.8%.

SLVM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sylvamo Corporation reported a net income of -3.00M and revenue of 755.00M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.

DRD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DRDGOLD Limited reported a net income of 1.84B and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVM and DRD in my portfolio?

SLVM and DRD have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLVM or DRD?

DRD has higher volatility (18.39%) compared to SLVM (13.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVM dropped -60.56% vs DRD's -98.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.